Back to top

Experiment: Relationship between inertia and mass using an inertial balance

To investigate how the inertia of an object, shown by its period of oscillation on an inertial balance, depends on its mass.

  • Specialist SPM Physics tutoring
  • 5,000+ students helped
  • Experienced Physics teachers
  • Fully online 1-to-1, nationwide
  • Real 1-hour paid trial, from RM50/hr
  • Built on the official SPM syllabus

Aim

To investigate how the inertia of an object, shown by its period of oscillation on an inertial balance, depends on its mass.

Variables

  • Manipulated: Mass loaded on the inertial balance, m
  • Responding: Period of horizontal oscillation, T
  • Constant: The inertial balance (its stiffness) and the amplitude of oscillation

Apparatus & materials

  • Inertial balance (or a hacksaw blade clamped to the bench)
  • Slotted masses
  • G-clamp
  • Stopwatch
  • Retort stand

Procedure

  1. Clamp the inertial balance firmly to the edge of the bench so its pan can swing horizontally.
  2. Place a mass m = 100 g on the pan.
  3. Displace the pan a fixed distance to one side and release it so it oscillates horizontally.
  4. Time 10 complete oscillations and record t; calculate T = t / 10.
  5. Repeat for m = 200, 300, 400 and 500 g.
  6. Record m, t and T, and calculate T² for each mass.

Tabulating results

Record mass m in g (or kg), the time for 10 oscillations t in s, the period T = t / 10 in s, and T² in s². Keep the decimal places consistent.

The graph

Plot T² (y-axis) against m (x-axis). The straight line shows that a larger mass gives a longer period, and T² is directly proportional to m.

Analysis

A greater mass has greater inertia, so it resists the change in its motion more and takes longer to complete each oscillation. The period T (and T²) therefore increases as the mass increases.

Precautions

  • Use the same amplitude each time so only the mass is changed.
  • Make sure the clamp holds the balance firmly so no energy is lost to the bench.
  • Count the oscillations from the same point of the swing.

Force and Motion I · Graph skills

Sample results and what they show

These are example readings, not a mark scheme. For masses m = 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 g on the inertial balance, the period T rose from about 0.40 s to 0.89 s, giving T² of about 0.16, 0.32, 0.48, 0.64 and 0.80 s².

The pattern is that a heavier load swings back and forth more slowly. The mass has more inertia, so it resists the blade's changing motion more strongly and each oscillation takes longer.

Because the times are short, count 10 (or more) oscillations and divide, rather than timing one. The derived column shows the real relationship: T² is directly proportional to m, T² doubles from 0.16 s² to 0.32 s² as m doubles from 100 g to 200 g.

This is a horizontal oscillation, so gravity is not the restoring force; the springiness of the blade is, which is why the result depends on inertia rather than weight.

Reading the graph and finding the answer

Plot T² / s² on the y-axis against m / kg on the x-axis. The points give a straight line, showing T² increases in direct proportion to the mass, greater mass, greater inertia, longer period.

Take the gradient from a large triangle on the best-fit line. Using (0.100 kg, 0.16 s²) and (0.500 kg, 0.80 s²): gradient = (0.80 − 0.16) s² ÷ (0.500 − 0.100) kg = 0.64 s² ÷ 0.400 kg = 1.6 s² kg⁻¹.

The steady positive gradient is the quantitative statement that inertia rises with mass; for the inertial balance T² = (4π²/k) m, so the gradient equals 4π²/k, where k is the stiffness of the blade. The key reading of the graph is simply that a straight line of positive gradient links period-squared to mass, confirming the aim.

Marks examiners look for

State the variables: manipulated m / g, responding T / s, with the same balance (its stiffness) and the same amplitude kept constant. Using the same starting displacement every time is the fair-test point, since the period must depend on mass alone, not on how hard you push the pan.

Clamp the blade firmly so no energy leaks into the bench, and count oscillations from the same point of the swing. Tabulate m / g, t / s for 10 oscillations, T / s and T² / s², with units in the headings and consistent decimals.

On the graph, draw a single best-fit straight line and comment that its positive gradient shows inertia increasing with mass. A conclusion that states T² ∝ m and explains it in terms of inertia, a larger mass resisting the change in motion more, secures the analysis mark.

Avoid describing this as a gravity or weighing experiment; on a horizontal balance the result is set by inertia.

Source: DSKP KSSM Physics Form 4 and 5 (Versi English) (Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum (BPK), KPM)

Written by the spmphysics.com.my editorial team.· Updated 5 Sept 2026

Frequently asked questions

Do I need a lab to practise?
No, the Paper 3 graph and analysis skills can be practised from home with example data.
Why does this experiment work sideways instead of hanging masses?
Hanging a mass would measure its weight, which depends on gravity. Swinging it horizontally on a springy blade removes gravity as the restoring force, so the period depends on the object inertia, its resistance to a change in motion, which is what the experiment sets out to study.
Why plot T² against m and not T against m?
For the inertial balance T = 2π√(m/k), so T against m is a curve. Squaring gives T² = (4π²/k) m, a straight line, which is far easier to draw a best fit through and shows the proportionality clearly.
What is kept constant, and why does it matter?
The same blade (so k is fixed) and the same amplitude each time. If you displaced the pan further for a heavier mass, you would be changing two things at once and could not tell whether the longer period came from the mass or the bigger swing.

Book a Trial Class

One-hour paid trial · Same-day reply · from RM50/hr

Book a Trial Class

One-hour paid trial · Same-day reply